Aalayah vs Aaleiya
American parents have registered 1,276 Aalayahs since 1880, against 29 Aaleiyas. Aalayah is still ahead, with 54 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Aalayah Aaleiya
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Aalayah has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1994 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 2017, when Aalayah had 61 and Aaleiya had 19.
Side by side
| Aalayah | Aaleiya | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 1,276 | 29 |
| Most in one year | 79 | 19 |
| Babies in 2025 | 54 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 1,300 | 30 |
| Median age today | 10 | 8 |
| Peak year | 2019 | 2017 |
| Best rank | 2,285th girls | 6,287th girls |
| Rank in 2025 | 3,028th | unranked |
| First recorded | 1994 | 2017 |
| Girls / boys | 1,276 / 0 | 29 / 0 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Aalayahs alive today are over 10; half the Aaleiyas are over 8. That is 2 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Aalayah and Aaleiya.