Almeda vs Almetta
American parents have registered 4,402 Almedas since 1880, against 372 Almettas. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Almeda Almetta
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Almeda has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1880 to 1998. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 1955, when Almeda had 17 and Almetta had 11.
Side by side
| Almeda | Almetta | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 4,402 | 372 |
| Most in one year | 135 | 17 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 760 | 100 |
| Median age today | 74 | 78 |
| Peak year | 1921 | 1921 |
| Best rank | 636th girls | 2,195th girls |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | unranked |
| First recorded | 1880 | 1910 |
| Girls / boys | 4,402 / 0 | 372 / 0 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Almettas alive today are over 78; half the Almedas are over 74. That is 4 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Almeda Oklahoma (6.2×), West Virginia (4.7×), Pennsylvania (4.4×)
- Almetta South Carolina (68.0×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Almeda and Almetta.