Humanverse

Almeta vs Almon

American parents have registered 2,241 Almetas since 1880, against 1,628 Almons. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Almeta against Almon, 1880 to 2025 0 20 40 60 80 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Almeta Almon

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 113 years in which either name was published, Almeta for 80 years and Almon for 33 years. The lead changed hands 26 times.

15 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Almeta Almon
Total US births 2,2411,628
Most in one year 6959
Babies in 2025 under 5under 5
Estimated living today 640380
Median age today 7265
Peak year 19241918
Best rank 914th girls855th boys
Rank in 2025 unrankedunranked
First recorded 18841880
Girls / boys 2,241 / 018 / 1,610

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Almetas alive today are over 72; half the Almons are over 65. That is 7 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Almeta and Almon.