Humanverse

Alonda vs Alonza

American parents have registered 3,321 Alonzas since 1880, against 877 Alondas. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Alonda against Alonza, 1880 to 2025 0 15 30 45 60 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Alonda Alonza

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 133 years in which either name was published, Alonza for 116 years and Alonda for 17 years. The lead changed hands 18 times.

12 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Alonda Alonza
Total US births 8773,321
Most in one year 3960
Babies in 2025 under 5under 5
Estimated living today 8201,500
Median age today 4760
Peak year 19701961
Best rank 2,081st girls1,001st boys
Rank in 2025 unrankedunranked
First recorded 19491880
Girls / boys 877 / 06 / 3,315

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Alonzas alive today are over 60; half the Alondas are over 47. That is 13 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Alonda and Alonza.