Humanverse

Alonza vs Aloysius

American parents have registered 5,724 Aloysiuses since 1880, against 3,321 Alonzas. Aloysius is still ahead, with 20 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Alonza against Aloysius, 1880 to 2025 0 50 100 150 200 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Alonza Aloysius

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 146 years in which either name was published, Aloysius for 90 years and Alonza for 56 years. The lead changed hands 18 times.

13 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Alonza Aloysius
Total US births 3,3215,724
Most in one year 60199
Babies in 2025 under 520
Estimated living today 1,5001,400
Median age today 6049
Peak year 19611916
Best rank 1,001st boys394th boys
Rank in 2025 unranked4,857th
First recorded 18801880
Girls / boys 6 / 3,3150 / 5,724

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Alonzas alive today are over 60; half the Aloysiuses are over 49. That is 11 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Alonza and Aloysius.