Ardell vs Ardyce
American parents have registered 5,070 Ardells since 1880, against 1,263 Ardyces. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Ardell Ardyce
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Ardell has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1889 to 2023. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 1936, when Ardell had 89 and Ardyce had 55.
Side by side
| Ardell | Ardyce | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 5,070 | 1,263 |
| Most in one year | 151 | 55 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 1,500 | 350 |
| Median age today | 70 | 81 |
| Peak year | 1922 | 1936 |
| Best rank | 742nd girls | 921st girls |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | unranked |
| First recorded | 1889 | 1912 |
| Girls / boys | 2,635 / 2,435 | 1,263 / 0 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Ardyces alive today are over 81; half the Ardells are over 70. That is 11 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Ardell North Dakota (35.5×), Minnesota (16.4×), South Dakota (11.2×)
- Ardyce Nebraska (23.9×), Minnesota (22.4×), South Dakota (12.9×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Ardell and Ardyce.