Arrington vs Arron
American parents have registered 8,249 Arrons since 1880, against 749 Arringtons. But in 2025 it was Arrington that was commoner, 15 babies to 12.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Arrington Arron
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 113 years in which either name was published, Arron for 112 years and Arrington for 1 year. The lead changed hands once.
Side by side
| Arrington | Arron | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 749 | 8,249 |
| Most in one year | 32 | 293 |
| Babies in 2025 | 15 | 12 |
| Estimated living today | 730 | 7,500 |
| Median age today | 20 | 36 |
| Peak year | 2005 | 1989 |
| Best rank | 4,464th boys | 580th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 8,243rd | 6,803rd |
| First recorded | 1970 | 1900 |
| Girls / boys | 239 / 510 | 173 / 8,076 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Arrons alive today are over 36; half the Arringtons are over 20. That is 16 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Arrington and Arron.