Bane vs Banks

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Bane Banks

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 86 years in which either name was published, Banks for 84 years and Bane for 2 years. The lead changed hands 4 times.

• 1883–2002 Banks ahead
• 2003 Bane ahead
• 2004–2012 Banks ahead
• 2013 Bane ahead
• 2014–2025 Banks ahead

Side by side

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Banes alive today are over 10; half the Bankses are over 3. That is 7 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

• Bane Florida (5.3×), California (2.4×), Texas (2.2×)
• Banks Utah (5.5×), South Carolina (3.7×), North Carolina (3.5×)

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

• Bane vs Banner
• Bane vs Banesa
• Banks vs Banner
• Banks vs Banesa