Bella vs Belton
American parents have registered 83,766 Bellas since 1880, against 1,178 Beltons. Bella is still ahead, with 2,129 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Bella Belton
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 146 years in which either name was published, Bella for 145 years and Belton for 1 year. The lead changed hands 2 times.
Side by side
| Bella | Belton | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 83,766 | 1,178 |
| Most in one year | 5,144 | 33 |
| Babies in 2025 | 2,129 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 79,000 | 340 |
| Median age today | 11 | 69 |
| Peak year | 2010 | 1923 |
| Best rank | 48th girls | 1,256th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 136th | unranked |
| First recorded | 1880 | 1881 |
| Girls / boys | 83,721 / 45 | 0 / 1,178 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Beltons alive today are over 69; half the Bellas are over 11. That is 58 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Bella Nevada (3.6×), Arizona (2.1×), Florida (2.0×)
- Belton South Carolina (42.8×), Alabama (8.6×), North Carolina (5.9×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Bella and Belton.