Blondell vs Blouncie
American parents have registered 1,490 Blondells since 1880, against 8 Blouncies. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Blondell Blouncie
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Blondell has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1906 to 1975. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 1920, when Blondell had 24 and Blouncie had 8.
Side by side
| Blondell | Blouncie | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 1,490 | 8 |
| Most in one year | 51 | 8 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 590 | 0 |
| Median age today | 74 | 105 |
| Peak year | 1934 | 1920 |
| Best rank | 1,019th girls | 3,208th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | unranked |
| First recorded | 1906 | 1920 |
| Girls / boys | 1,475 / 15 | 0 / 8 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Blouncies alive today are over 105; half the Blondells are over 74. That is 31 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Blondell and Blouncie.