Brianna vs Briggitte
American parents have registered 265,237 Briannas since 1880, against 132 Briggittes. Brianna is still ahead, with 1,372 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Brianna Briggitte
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 67 years in which either name was published, Brianna for 63 years and Briggitte for 4 years. The lead changed hands once.
Side by side
| Brianna | Briggitte | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 265,237 | 132 |
| Most in one year | 12,898 | 24 |
| Babies in 2025 | 1,372 | 24 |
| Estimated living today | 262,000 | 120 |
| Median age today | 24 | 58 |
| Peak year | 2000 | 2025 |
| Best rank | 15th girls | 5,238th girls |
| Rank in 2025 | 222nd | 5,238th |
| First recorded | 1963 | 1959 |
| Girls / boys | 264,799 / 438 | 132 / 0 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Briggittes alive today are over 58; half the Briannas are over 24. That is 34 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Brianna and Briggitte.