Humanverse

Brooke vs Brookelynn

American parents have registered 200,521 Brookes since 1880, against 3,475 Brookelynns. Brooke is still ahead, with 972 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Brooke against Brookelynn, 1880 to 2025 0 2k 4k 6k 8k 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Brooke Brookelynn

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Brooke has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1914 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.

The closest they came was 2012, when Brooke had 2,976 and Brookelynn had 197.

Side by side

  Brooke Brookelynn
Total US births 200,5213,475
Most in one year 6,749240
Babies in 2025 97223
Estimated living today 196,0003,400
Median age today 2816
Peak year 19962008
Best rank 45th girls1,087th girls
Rank in 2025 313th5,410th
First recorded 19141980
Girls / boys 198,491 / 2,0303,475 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Brookes alive today are over 28; half the Brookelynns are over 16. That is 12 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Brooke and Brookelynn.