Humanverse

Brooks vs Brown

American parents have registered 59,639 Brookses since 1880, against 1,482 Browns. Brooks is still ahead, with 4,965 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Brooks against Brown, 1880 to 2025 0 1.3k 2.5k 3.8k 5k 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Brooks Brown

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 146 years in which either name was published, Brooks for 130 years and Brown for 16 years. The lead changed hands 16 times.

12 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Brooks Brown
Total US births 59,6391,482
Most in one year 4,96555
Babies in 2025 4,96510
Estimated living today 56,000300
Median age today 666
Peak year 20251918
Best rank 64th boys894th boys
Rank in 2025 64th7,679th
First recorded 18801881
Girls / boys 1,693 / 57,9465 / 1,477

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Browns alive today are over 66; half the Brookses are over 6. That is 60 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Brooks and Brown.