Humanverse

Burdette vs Burnell

American parents have registered 3,383 Burnells since 1880, against 1,841 Burdettes. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Burdette against Burnell, 1880 to 2025 0 25 50 75 100 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Burdette Burnell

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 108 years in which either name was published, Burnell for 96 years and Burdette for 12 years. The lead changed hands 9 times.

Side by side

  Burdette Burnell
Total US births 1,8413,383
Most in one year 7686
Babies in 2025 under 5under 5
Estimated living today 3401,200
Median age today 7467
Peak year 19221920
Best rank 766th boys816th boys
Rank in 2025 unrankedunranked
First recorded 18851906
Girls / boys 127 / 1,714593 / 2,790

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Burdettes alive today are over 74; half the Burnells are over 67. That is 7 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Burdette and Burnell.