Burgess vs Burt
American parents have registered 6,555 Burts since 1880, against 1,089 Burgesses. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Burgess Burt
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 125 years in which either name was published, Burt for 122 years and Burgess for 3 years. The lead changed hands 4 times.
Side by side
| Burgess | Burt | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 1,089 | 6,555 |
| Most in one year | 28 | 152 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 400 | 3,000 |
| Median age today | 63 | 63 |
| Peak year | 1922 | 1956 |
| Best rank | 1,396th boys | 615th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | unranked |
| First recorded | 1884 | 1880 |
| Girls / boys | 0 / 1,089 | 0 / 6,555 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Burgess and Burt.