Burl vs Burnest
American parents have registered 7,200 Burls since 1880, against 34 Burnests. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Burl Burnest
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Burl has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1880 to 2024. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 1952, when Burl had 83 and Burnest had 5.
Side by side
| Burl | Burnest | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 7,200 | 34 |
| Most in one year | 211 | 9 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 2,000 | 8 |
| Median age today | 69 | 79 |
| Peak year | 1921 | 1921 |
| Best rank | 418th boys | 2,986th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | unranked |
| First recorded | 1880 | 1921 |
| Girls / boys | 19 / 7,181 | 0 / 34 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Burnests alive today are over 79; half the Burls are over 69. That is 10 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Burl and Burnest.