Burla vs Burnell
American parents have registered 3,383 Burnells since 1880, against 13 Burlas. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Burla Burnell
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Burnell has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1906 to 2022. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 1922, when Burla had 8 and Burnell had 69.
Side by side
| Burla | Burnell | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 13 | 3,383 |
| Most in one year | 8 | 86 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 2 | 1,200 |
| Median age today | 84 | 67 |
| Peak year | 1922 | 1920 |
| Best rank | 3,655th girls | 816th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | unranked |
| First recorded | 1922 | 1906 |
| Girls / boys | 13 / 0 | 593 / 2,790 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Burlas alive today are over 84; half the Burnells are over 67. That is 17 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Burla and Burnell.