Byrl vs Byrum
American parents have registered 586 Byrls since 1880, against 9 Byrums. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Byrl Byrum
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Byrl has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1907 to 1958. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 1919, when Byrl had 23 and Byrum had 9.
Side by side
| Byrl | Byrum | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 586 | 9 |
| Most in one year | 30 | 9 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 80 | 0 |
| Median age today | 80 | 106 |
| Peak year | 1917 | 1919 |
| Best rank | 1,437th boys | 2,877th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | unranked |
| First recorded | 1907 | 1919 |
| Girls / boys | 53 / 533 | 0 / 9 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Byrums alive today are over 106; half the Byrls are over 80. That is 26 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Byrl and Byrum.