Cole vs Coletta
American parents have registered 154,646 Coles since 1880, against 2,384 Colettas. Cole is still ahead, with 2,009 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Cole Coletta
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 136 years in which either name was published, Cole for 83 years and Coletta for 53 years. The lead changed hands 8 times.
Side by side
| Cole | Coletta | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 154,646 | 2,384 |
| Most in one year | 6,054 | 62 |
| Babies in 2025 | 2,009 | 6 |
| Estimated living today | 151,000 | 900 |
| Median age today | 20 | 65 |
| Peak year | 2002 | 1924 |
| Best rank | 69th boys | 970th girls |
| Rank in 2025 | 182nd | 13,208th |
| First recorded | 1886 | 1889 |
| Girls / boys | 553 / 154,093 | 2,384 / 0 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Colettas alive today are over 65; half the Coles are over 20. That is 45 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Cole Utah (2.3×), Alaska (2.2×), Montana (2.1×)
- Coletta Ohio (14.3×), Illinois (2.5×), Pennsylvania (1.9×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Cole and Coletta.