Dace vs Dack
American parents have registered 542 Daces since 1880, against 50 Dacks. Dace is still ahead, with 16 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Dace Dack
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 52 years in which either name was published, Dace for 47 years and Dack for 5 years. The lead changed hands 4 times.
Side by side
| Dace | Dack | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 542 | 50 |
| Most in one year | 23 | 13 |
| Babies in 2025 | 16 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 520 | 40 |
| Median age today | 17 | 55 |
| Peak year | 2011 | 1974 |
| Best rank | 4,221st boys | 2,799th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 5,608th | unranked |
| First recorded | 1953 | 1968 |
| Girls / boys | 18 / 524 | 0 / 50 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Dacks alive today are over 55; half the Daces are over 17. That is 38 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Dace and Dack.