Daphine vs Daphnie
American parents have registered 1,497 Daphines since 1880, against 880 Daphnies. But in 2025 it was Daphnie that was commoner, 7 babies to fewer than five.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Daphine Daphnie
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 112 years in which either name was published, Daphine for 67 years and Daphnie for 45 years. The lead changed hands 9 times.
Side by side
| Daphine | Daphnie | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 1,497 | 880 |
| Most in one year | 49 | 36 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | 7 |
| Estimated living today | 890 | 860 |
| Median age today | 61 | 22 |
| Peak year | 1962 | 2014 |
| Best rank | 1,607th girls | 4,103rd girls |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | 11,932nd |
| First recorded | 1914 | 1962 |
| Girls / boys | 1,497 / 0 | 880 / 0 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Daphines alive today are over 61; half the Daphnies are over 22. That is 39 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Daphine North Carolina (23.8×), Texas (1.7×)
- Daphnie California (5.2×), Texas (4.6×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Daphine and Daphnie.