Darnice vs Darryl
American parents have registered 93,419 Darryls since 1880, against 157 Darnices. Darryl is still ahead, with 69 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Darnice Darryl
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Darryl has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1913 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 1976, when Darnice had 10 and Darryl had 711.
Side by side
| Darnice | Darryl | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 157 | 93,419 |
| Most in one year | 18 | 5,178 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | 69 |
| Estimated living today | 140 | 75,000 |
| Median age today | 64 | 59 |
| Peak year | 1958 | 1961 |
| Best rank | 2,755th girls | 80th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | 2,108th |
| First recorded | 1952 | 1913 |
| Girls / boys | 157 / 0 | 1,134 / 92,285 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Darnices alive today are over 64; half the Darryls are over 59. That is 5 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Darnice and Darryl.