Deann vs Deanna
American parents have registered 134,743 Deannas since 1880, against 10,185 Deanns. Deanna is still ahead, with 85 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Deann Deanna
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Deanna has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1899 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 1932, when Deann had 5 and Deanna had 6.
Side by side
| Deann | Deanna | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 10,185 | 134,743 |
| Most in one year | 438 | 4,344 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | 85 |
| Estimated living today | 8,800 | 116,000 |
| Median age today | 58 | 52 |
| Peak year | 1962 | 1970 |
| Best rank | 464th girls | 90th girls |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | 2,173rd |
| First recorded | 1931 | 1899 |
| Girls / boys | 10,185 / 0 | 134,477 / 266 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Deanns alive today are over 58; half the Deannas are over 52. That is 6 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Deann Utah (8.2×), North Dakota (6.6×), Idaho (5.4×)
- Deanna Kansas (1.6×), South Dakota (1.6×), Oregon (1.5×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Deann and Deanna.