Diahn vs Diamond
American parents have registered 36,297 Diamonds since 1880, against 65 Diahns. Diamond is still ahead, with 131 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Diahn Diamond
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 107 years in which either name was published, Diamond for 104 years and Diahn for 3 years. The lead changed hands 4 times.
Side by side
| Diahn | Diamond | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 65 | 36,297 |
| Most in one year | 24 | 2,210 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | 131 |
| Estimated living today | 60 | 35,000 |
| Median age today | 60 | 26 |
| Peak year | 1964 | 1999 |
| Best rank | 2,530th girls | 150th girls |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | 2,017th |
| First recorded | 1964 | 1897 |
| Girls / boys | 65 / 0 | 33,733 / 2,564 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Diahns alive today are over 60; half the Diamonds are over 26. That is 34 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Diahn and Diamond.