Diamonique vs Dianne
American parents have registered 95,475 Diannes since 1880, against 984 Diamoniques. Dianne is still ahead, with 21 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Diamonique Dianne
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 111 years in which either name was published, Dianne for 110 years and Diamonique for 1 year. The lead changed hands 2 times.
- 1911–1998 Dianne ahead
- 1999 Diamonique ahead
- 2000–2025 Dianne ahead
Side by side
| Diamonique | Dianne | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 984 | 95,475 |
| Most in one year | 84 | 4,421 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | 21 |
| Estimated living today | 970 | 70,000 |
| Median age today | 26 | 71 |
| Peak year | 1999 | 1947 |
| Best rank | 1,874th girls | 83rd girls |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | 5,722nd |
| First recorded | 1986 | 1911 |
| Girls / boys | 984 / 0 | 95,289 / 186 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Diannes alive today are over 71; half the Diamoniques are over 26. That is 45 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Diamonique Florida (3.4×), New York (2.8×), Michigan (2.4×)
- Dianne South Dakota (2.4×), Massachusetts (2.3×), Louisiana (2.1×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Diamonique and Dianne.