Dillard vs Dilynn
American parents have registered 3,730 Dillards since 1880, against 548 Dilynns. But in 2025 it was Dilynn that was commoner, 10 babies to fewer than five.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Dillard Dilynn
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 142 years in which either name was published, Dillard for 117 years and Dilynn for 25 years. The lead changed hands 3 times.
Side by side
| Dillard | Dilynn | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 3,730 | 548 |
| Most in one year | 96 | 41 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | 10 |
| Estimated living today | 1,100 | 540 |
| Median age today | 67 | 12 |
| Peak year | 1921 | 2011 |
| Best rank | 658th boys | 3,723rd girls |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | 9,457th |
| First recorded | 1880 | 1992 |
| Girls / boys | 0 / 3,730 | 508 / 40 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Dillards alive today are over 67; half the Dilynns are over 12. That is 55 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Dillard and Dilynn.