Edd vs Eddy
American parents have registered 14,431 Eddys since 1880, against 5,451 Edds. Eddy is still ahead, with 113 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Edd Eddy
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 146 years in which either name was published, Eddy for 90 years and Edd for 56 years. The lead changed hands once.
Side by side
| Edd | Eddy | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 5,451 | 14,431 |
| Most in one year | 169 | 253 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | 113 |
| Estimated living today | 910 | 11,000 |
| Median age today | 71 | 39 |
| Peak year | 1919 | 1956 |
| Best rank | 464th boys | 484th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | 1,602nd |
| First recorded | 1880 | 1884 |
| Girls / boys | 13 / 5,438 | 392 / 14,039 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Edds alive today are over 71; half the Eddys are over 39. That is 32 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Edd Mississippi (8.3×), Tennessee (7.1×), Alabama (6.8×)
- Eddy Texas (2.5×), Florida (2.5×), California (2.3×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Edd and Eddy.