Eleanore vs Electa
American parents have registered 18,724 Eleanores since 1880, against 1,181 Electas. Eleanore is still ahead, with 156 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Eleanore Electa
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 146 years in which either name was published, Eleanore for 145 years and Electa for 1 year. The lead changed hands 2 times.
Side by side
| Eleanore | Electa | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 18,724 | 1,181 |
| Most in one year | 768 | 40 |
| Babies in 2025 | 156 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 4,100 | 280 |
| Median age today | 34 | 67 |
| Peak year | 1921 | 1918 |
| Best rank | 235th girls | 1,184th girls |
| Rank in 2025 | 1,396th | unranked |
| First recorded | 1880 | 1880 |
| Girls / boys | 18,724 / 0 | 1,181 / 0 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Electas alive today are over 67; half the Eleanores are over 34. That is 33 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Eleanore and Electa.