Ella vs Ellsworth
American parents have registered 352,214 Ellas since 1880, against 7,337 Ellsworths. Ella is still ahead, with 5,831 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Ella Ellsworth
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Ella has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1880 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 1978, when Ella had 174 and Ellsworth had 18.
Side by side
| Ella | Ellsworth | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 352,214 | 7,337 |
| Most in one year | 9,898 | 300 |
| Babies in 2025 | 5,831 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 226,000 | 1,100 |
| Median age today | 14 | 72 |
| Peak year | 2010 | 1918 |
| Best rank | 13th girls | 330th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 29th | unranked |
| First recorded | 1880 | 1880 |
| Girls / boys | 351,313 / 901 | 0 / 7,337 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Ellsworths alive today are over 72; half the Ellas are over 14. That is 58 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Ella Mississippi (2.0×), South Carolina (1.9×), Alabama (1.7×)
- Ellsworth Maryland (5.3×), Minnesota (4.6×), Wisconsin (3.6×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Ella and Ellsworth.