Humanverse

Ema vs Emaline

American parents have registered 4,857 Emas since 1880, against 1,901 Emalines. Ema is still ahead, with 164 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Ema against Emaline, 1880 to 2025 0 50 100 150 200 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Ema Emaline

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 139 years in which either name was published, Ema for 108 years and Emaline for 31 years. The lead changed hands 18 times.

11 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Ema Emaline
Total US births 4,8571,901
Most in one year 16473
Babies in 2025 16428
Estimated living today 4,2001,200
Median age today 1412
Peak year 20252016
Best rank 1,348th girls2,479th girls
Rank in 2025 1,348th4,758th
First recorded 18831885
Girls / boys 4,857 / 01,901 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Emas alive today are over 14; half the Emalines are over 12. That is 2 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Ema and Emaline.