Humanverse

Gilbert vs Gilmer

American parents have registered 130,821 Gilberts since 1880, against 1,187 Gilmers. Gilbert is still ahead, with 145 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Gilbert against Gilmer, 1880 to 2025 0 600 1.2k 1.8k 2.4k 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Gilbert Gilmer

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Gilbert has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1880 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.

The closest they came was 2023, when Gilbert had 175 and Gilmer had 10.

Side by side

  Gilbert Gilmer
Total US births 130,8211,187
Most in one year 2,13844
Babies in 2025 145under 5
Estimated living today 62,000330
Median age today 5968
Peak year 19301918
Best rank 90th boys1,012th boys
Rank in 2025 1,328thunranked
First recorded 18801907
Girls / boys 673 / 130,1480 / 1,187

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Gilmers alive today are over 68; half the Gilberts are over 59. That is 9 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Gilbert and Gilmer.