Hazelle vs Hazle
American parents have registered 2,485 Hazles since 1880, against 932 Hazelles. But in 2025 it was Hazelle that was commoner, 20 babies to fewer than five.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Hazelle Hazle
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 99 years in which either name was published, Hazle for 74 years and Hazelle for 25 years. The lead changed hands 3 times.
Side by side
| Hazelle | Hazle | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 932 | 2,485 |
| Most in one year | 34 | 99 |
| Babies in 2025 | 20 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 390 | 320 |
| Median age today | 10 | 80 |
| Peak year | 1914 | 1924 |
| Best rank | 1,023rd girls | 761st girls |
| Rank in 2025 | 5,917th | unranked |
| First recorded | 1888 | 1887 |
| Girls / boys | 932 / 0 | 2,442 / 43 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Hazles alive today are over 80; half the Hazelles are over 10. That is 70 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Hazelle California (5.7×)
- Hazle Mississippi (9.4×), Tennessee (7.5×), Oklahoma (7.2×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Hazelle and Hazle.