Hilda vs Hill
American parents have registered 81,200 Hildas since 1880, against 577 Hills. Hilda is still ahead, with 55 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Hilda Hill
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Hilda has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1880 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 2017, when Hilda had 36 and Hill had 10.
Side by side
| Hilda | Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 81,200 | 577 |
| Most in one year | 2,137 | 21 |
| Babies in 2025 | 55 | 6 |
| Estimated living today | 22,000 | 200 |
| Median age today | 67 | 28 |
| Peak year | 1921 | 1919 |
| Best rank | 123rd girls | 1,624th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 2,998th | 10,695th |
| First recorded | 1880 | 1884 |
| Girls / boys | 81,022 / 178 | 0 / 577 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Hildas alive today are over 67; half the Hills are over 28. That is 39 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Hilda and Hill.