Hilliard vs Hilma
American parents have registered 2,999 Hilmas since 1880, against 1,859 Hilliards. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Hilliard Hilma
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 107 years in which either name was published, Hilma for 56 years and Hilliard for 51 years. The lead changed hands 8 times.
Side by side
| Hilliard | Hilma | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 1,859 | 2,999 |
| Most in one year | 53 | 105 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 480 | 250 |
| Median age today | 68 | 80 |
| Peak year | 1920 | 1915 |
| Best rank | 947th boys | 644th girls |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | unranked |
| First recorded | 1880 | 1880 |
| Girls / boys | 0 / 1,859 | 2,999 / 0 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Hilmas alive today are over 80; half the Hilliards are over 68. That is 12 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Hilliard Alabama (10.6×), North Carolina (10.4×), Georgia (7.3×)
- Hilma North Dakota (17.3×), Minnesota (16.6×), Michigan (4.7×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Hilliard and Hilma.