Jewell vs Jewels
American parents have registered 34,126 Jewells since 1880, against 1,274 Jewelses. But in 2025 it was Jewels that was commoner, 46 babies to 19.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Jewell Jewels
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 145 years in which either name was published, Jewell for 135 years and Jewels for 10 years. The lead changed hands 5 times.
Side by side
| Jewell | Jewels | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 34,126 | 1,274 |
| Most in one year | 1,004 | 57 |
| Babies in 2025 | 19 | 46 |
| Estimated living today | 9,100 | 1,300 |
| Median age today | 68 | 14 |
| Peak year | 1920 | 2015 |
| Best rank | 216th girls | 3,001st girls |
| Rank in 2025 | 7,491st | 3,645th |
| First recorded | 1880 | 1987 |
| Girls / boys | 29,442 / 4,684 | 1,240 / 34 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Jewells alive today are over 68; half the Jewelses are over 14. That is 54 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Jewell Arkansas (7.1×), Kentucky (6.3×), Oklahoma (4.8×)
- Jewels Florida (4.7×), California (4.4×), Texas (4.1×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Jewell and Jewels.