Humanverse

Jil vs Jillene

American parents have registered 632 Jillenes since 1880, against 559 Jils. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Jil against Jillene, 1880 to 2025 0 10 20 30 40 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Jil Jillene

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 51 years in which either name was published, Jillene for 31 years and Jil for 20 years. The lead changed hands 14 times.

10 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Jil Jillene
Total US births 559632
Most in one year 3635
Babies in 2025 under 5under 5
Estimated living today 480560
Median age today 6356
Peak year 19571970
Best rank 1,808th girls2,240th girls
Rank in 2025 unrankedunranked
First recorded 19451938
Girls / boys 559 / 0632 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Jils alive today are over 63; half the Jillenes are over 56. That is 7 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Jil and Jillene.