Jon vs Jonn
American parents have registered 169,391 Jons since 1880, against 537 Jonns. Jon is still ahead, with 246 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Jon Jonn
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Jon has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1898 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 2009, when Jon had 451 and Jonn had 8.
Side by side
| Jon | Jonn | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 169,391 | 537 |
| Most in one year | 4,941 | 19 |
| Babies in 2025 | 246 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 131,000 | 450 |
| Median age today | 56 | 50 |
| Peak year | 1964 | 1970 |
| Best rank | 79th boys | 2,058th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 951st | unranked |
| First recorded | 1898 | 1937 |
| Girls / boys | 1,249 / 168,142 | 0 / 537 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Jons alive today are over 56; half the Jonns are over 50. That is 6 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Both names abroad
Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.
Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Jon and Jonn.