Jorden vs Joreen
American parents have registered 9,365 Jordens since 1880, against 106 Joreens. Jorden is still ahead, with 28 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Jorden Joreen
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 71 years in which either name was published, Jorden for 59 years and Joreen for 12 years. The lead changed hands 4 times.
Side by side
| Jorden | Joreen | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 9,365 | 106 |
| Most in one year | 406 | 22 |
| Babies in 2025 | 28 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 9,100 | 40 |
| Median age today | 21 | 70 |
| Peak year | 2011 | 1928 |
| Best rank | 676th boys | 1,784th girls |
| Rank in 2025 | 3,848th | unranked |
| First recorded | 1903 | 1928 |
| Girls / boys | 2,335 / 7,030 | 106 / 0 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Joreens alive today are over 70; half the Jordens are over 21. That is 49 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Jorden and Joreen.