Humanverse

Keegan vs Keena

American parents have registered 42,324 Keegans since 1880, against 2,336 Keenas. Keegan is still ahead, with 497 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Keegan against Keena, 1880 to 2025 0 500 1k 1.5k 2k 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Keegan Keena

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 73 years in which either name was published, Keegan for 50 years and Keena for 23 years. The lead changed hands once.

Side by side

  Keegan Keena
Total US births 42,3242,336
Most in one year 1,888153
Babies in 2025 497under 5
Estimated living today 42,0002,200
Median age today 1842
Peak year 20071972
Best rank 222nd boys848th girls
Rank in 2025 621stunranked
First recorded 19651952
Girls / boys 3,805 / 38,5192,195 / 141

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Keenas alive today are over 42; half the Keegans are over 18. That is 24 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Keegan and Keena.