Keeley vs Keevin
American parents have registered 6,741 Keeleys since 1880, against 603 Keevins. Keeley is still ahead, with 135 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Keeley Keevin
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 74 years in which either name was published, Keeley for 68 years and Keevin for 6 years. The lead changed hands once.
Side by side
| Keeley | Keevin | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 6,741 | 603 |
| Most in one year | 253 | 21 |
| Babies in 2025 | 135 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 6,600 | 550 |
| Median age today | 22 | 37 |
| Peak year | 2007 | 1993 |
| Best rank | 1,041st girls | 3,141st boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 1,561st | unranked |
| First recorded | 1957 | 1951 |
| Girls / boys | 6,692 / 49 | 0 / 603 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Keevins alive today are over 37; half the Keeleys are over 22. That is 15 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Keeley and Keevin.