Khloey vs Khloie
American parents have registered 941 Khloies since 1880, against 789 Khloeys. But in 2025 it was Khloey that was commoner, 9 babies to 7.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Khloey Khloie
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 26 years in which either name was published, Khloie for 18 years and Khloey for 8 years. The lead changed hands 10 times.
Side by side
| Khloey | Khloie | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 789 | 941 |
| Most in one year | 102 | 111 |
| Babies in 2025 | 9 | 7 |
| Estimated living today | 780 | 930 |
| Median age today | 13 | 13 |
| Peak year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Best rank | 1,959th girls | 1,830th girls |
| Rank in 2025 | 10,107th | 11,932nd |
| First recorded | 2000 | 2000 |
| Girls / boys | 789 / 0 | 941 / 0 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Where each one is strongest
- Khloey Texas (5.1×), California (2.4×)
- Khloie Alabama (4.8×), Texas (4.1×), California (1.3×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Khloey and Khloie.