Humanverse

Kiki vs Kiko

American parents have registered 1,137 Kikis since 1880, against 282 Kikos. But in 2025 it was Kiko that was commoner, 22 babies to 13.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Kiki against Kiko, 1880 to 2025 0 13 25 38 50 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Kiki Kiko

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 87 years in which either name was published, Kiki for 78 years and Kiko for 9 years. The lead changed hands 5 times.

Side by side

  Kiki Kiko
Total US births 1,137282
Most in one year 4233
Babies in 2025 1322
Estimated living today 1,000280
Median age today 436
Peak year 19752021
Best rank 2,060th girls4,494th boys
Rank in 2025 7,885th7,679th
First recorded 19201979
Girls / boys 1,112 / 25125 / 157

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Kikis alive today are over 43; half the Kikos are over 6. That is 37 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Country Kiki Kiko
England and Wales 66712

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Kiki and Kiko.