Humanverse

Kimber vs Kimberlyn

American parents have registered 11,666 Kimbers since 1880, against 3,926 Kimberlyns. Kimber is still ahead, with 293 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Kimber against Kimberlyn, 1880 to 2025 0 150 300 450 600 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Kimber Kimberlyn

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 89 years in which either name was published, Kimber for 75 years and Kimberlyn for 14 years. The lead changed hands 8 times.

Side by side

  Kimber Kimberlyn
Total US births 11,6663,926
Most in one year 524121
Babies in 2025 29339
Estimated living today 11,0003,800
Median age today 1328
Peak year 20161993
Best rank 592nd girls1,358th girls
Rank in 2025 936th3,780th
First recorded 19141955
Girls / boys 11,215 / 4513,926 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Kimberlyns alive today are over 28; half the Kimbers are over 13. That is 15 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Kimber and Kimberlyn.