Kingston vs Kinta
American parents have registered 46,599 Kingstons since 1880, against 87 Kintas. Kingston is still ahead, with 1,725 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Kingston Kinta
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 62 years in which either name was published, Kingston for 58 years and Kinta for 4 years. The lead changed hands 2 times.
Side by side
| Kingston | Kinta | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 46,599 | 87 |
| Most in one year | 3,422 | 46 |
| Babies in 2025 | 1,725 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 46,000 | 80 |
| Median age today | 8 | 48 |
| Peak year | 2021 | 1977 |
| Best rank | 112th boys | 1,670th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 204th | unranked |
| First recorded | 1919 | 1977 |
| Girls / boys | 193 / 46,406 | 14 / 73 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Kintas alive today are over 48; half the Kingstons are over 8. That is 40 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Kingston and Kinta.