Humanverse

Lafonda vs Lafondra

American parents have registered 693 Lafondas since 1880, against 45 Lafondras. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Lafonda against Lafondra, 1880 to 2025 0 10 20 30 40 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Lafonda Lafondra

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Lafonda has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1928 to 1993. The lead has never changed hands.

The closest they came was 1962, when Lafonda had 35 and Lafondra had 30.

Side by side

  Lafonda Lafondra
Total US births 69345
Most in one year 3530
Babies in 2025 under 5under 5
Estimated living today 62040
Median age today 5563
Peak year 19621962
Best rank 1,947th girls2,163rd girls
Rank in 2025 unrankedunranked
First recorded 19281962
Girls / boys 693 / 045 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Lafondras alive today are over 63; half the Lafondas are over 55. That is 8 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Lafonda and Lafondra.