Humanverse

Lamarr vs Lamonte

American parents have registered 3,417 Lamontes since 1880, against 2,926 Lamarrs. Lamonte is still ahead, with 15 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Lamarr against Lamonte, 1880 to 2025 0 25 50 75 100 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Lamarr Lamonte

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 110 years in which either name was published, Lamonte for 73 years and Lamarr for 37 years. The lead changed hands 22 times.

12 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Lamarr Lamonte
Total US births 2,9263,417
Most in one year 7391
Babies in 2025 915
Estimated living today 2,4002,900
Median age today 4137
Peak year 19841971
Best rank 1,042nd boys857th boys
Rank in 2025 8,243rd5,861st
First recorded 19181915
Girls / boys 30 / 2,8960 / 3,417

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Lamarrs alive today are over 41; half the Lamontes are over 37. That is 4 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Lamarr and Lamonte.