Humanverse

Lane vs Lannie

American parents have registered 52,177 Lanes since 1880, against 3,424 Lannies. Lane is still ahead, with 1,495 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Lane against Lannie, 1880 to 2025 0 400 800 1.2k 1.6k 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Lane Lannie

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 138 years in which either name was published, Lane for 109 years and Lannie for 29 years. The lead changed hands 10 times.

Side by side

  Lane Lannie
Total US births 52,1773,424
Most in one year 1,505158
Babies in 2025 1,495under 5
Estimated living today 48,0001,800
Median age today 1866
Peak year 20191949
Best rank 258th boys569th boys
Rank in 2025 250thunranked
First recorded 18811881
Girls / boys 4,615 / 47,5621,566 / 1,858

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Lannies alive today are over 66; half the Lanes are over 18. That is 48 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Lane and Lannie.