Humanverse

Lasandra vs Lashanda

American parents have registered 4,674 Lashandas since 1880, against 1,520 Lasandras. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Lasandra against Lashanda, 1880 to 2025 0 80 160 240 320 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Lasandra Lashanda

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 64 years in which either name was published, Lashanda for 36 years and Lasandra for 28 years. The lead changed hands 7 times.

Side by side

  Lasandra Lashanda
Total US births 1,5204,674
Most in one year 69291
Babies in 2025 under 5under 5
Estimated living today 1,4004,500
Median age today 5045
Peak year 19721980
Best rank 1,414th girls626th girls
Rank in 2025 unrankedunranked
First recorded 19471962
Girls / boys 1,520 / 04,674 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Lasandras alive today are over 50; half the Lashandas are over 45. That is 5 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Lasandra and Lashanda.