Humanverse

Lawana vs Lawton

American parents have registered 3,029 Lawanas since 1880, against 2,866 Lawtons. But in 2025 it was Lawton that was commoner, 36 babies to fewer than five.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Lawana against Lawton, 1880 to 2025 0 25 50 75 100 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Lawana Lawton

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 129 years in which either name was published, Lawton for 74 years and Lawana for 55 years. The lead changed hands 10 times.

Side by side

  Lawana Lawton
Total US births 3,0292,866
Most in one year 8753
Babies in 2025 under 536
Estimated living today 2,2001,700
Median age today 6225
Peak year 19712021
Best rank 1,266th girls2,652nd boys
Rank in 2025 unranked3,240th
First recorded 19181889
Girls / boys 3,029 / 05 / 2,861

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Lawanas alive today are over 62; half the Lawtons are over 25. That is 37 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Lawana and Lawton.