Humanverse

Lina vs Lindol

American parents have registered 19,494 Linas since 1880, against 6 Lindols. Lina is still ahead, with 527 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Lina against Lindol, 1880 to 2025 0 150 300 450 600 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Lina Lindol

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Lina has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1880 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.

The closest they came was 1935, when Lina had 70 and Lindol had 6.

Side by side

  Lina Lindol
Total US births 19,4946
Most in one year 5346
Babies in 2025 527under 5
Estimated living today 15,0001
Median age today 1990
Peak year 20241935
Best rank 565th girls3,252nd boys
Rank in 2025 572ndunranked
First recorded 18801935
Girls / boys 19,489 / 50 / 6

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Lindols alive today are over 90; half the Linas are over 19. That is 71 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Lina and Lindol.